{
    "apiVersion": "1.4.0",
    "service": "spiralist-research-library",
    "release": "v100.0.66-behavioral-likelihood-character-runtime-integration-wip",
    "sourceCatalogRelease": "v100.0.42-ai-psyops-research-taxonomy-wip",
    "generatedAtUtc": "2026-08-20T15:27:27Z",
    "safePublicSummariesOnly": true,
    "filters": {
        "q": null,
        "group": "evidence-and-movements",
        "classification": null,
        "id": null,
        "cursor": 0,
        "limit": 20
    },
    "counts": {
        "totalReports": 146,
        "psychosis": 20,
        "espionage": 52,
        "espionagePsychosis": 37,
        "evidenceAndMovements": 12,
        "psychologicalWarfare": 13,
        "aiInteractionPsychosis": 12,
        "aiPsyops": 12,
        "exactDuplicatesRetained": 20,
        "matching": 12,
        "returned": 12
    },
    "cursor": 0,
    "nextCursor": null,
    "reports": [
        {
            "classification": "movement-structure-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-10-leaderless-movements-structure",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "network analysis",
                "movement comparison",
                "informal governance",
                "identity boundaries"
            ],
            "sha256": "9673ecc759b62384bb9c5e7c5684c03f18f35bebfb3b0f15a741f0c59875ff73",
            "summary": "Leaderless movements coordinate through open identity boundaries, shared symbols, temporary working groups, and communication infrastructure. Absence of formal leadership does not mean absence of influence: administrators, technical specialists, and highly visible accounts can become temporary gatekeepers. Open networks gain resilience but face factionalism, hijacking, infiltration, and accountability gaps.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-10-leaderless-movements-structure.md",
            "title": "Anonymous and Other Leaderless or Pseudonymous Movements",
            "bytes": 57522,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Leaderless Movements Structural Analysis.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "movement-history-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-06-anonymous-campaigns-chronology",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "chronology UI",
                "claim status",
                "legal evidence",
                "correction history"
            ],
            "sha256": "67e97c89419a35190630a20bdc2c93613608a5d82caf43ee6b4210c24003adc5",
            "summary": "Campaign records should preserve exact dates and distinguish claimed, legally established, independently corroborated, disputed, and unknown outcomes. Court records and pleas can establish individual conduct; social posts and branded releases alone provide much weaker attribution. Later corrections and disavowals are part of the campaign record.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-06-anonymous-campaigns-chronology.md",
            "title": "Anonymous Campaigns: Chronology, Claims, Attribution, and Outcomes",
            "bytes": 54820,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Anonymous Campaigns Chronology Research.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "legal-oversight-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-08-anonymous-legal-cases",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "legal status",
                "evidence hierarchy",
                "rights",
                "publication safety"
            ],
            "sha256": "d75dae6dbd7867922505b2a10f10d1c6d649f2fd8d2173a223c2cb0c401b8ffe",
            "summary": "Courts generally adjudicate provable acts by named defendants, not the abstract existence of Anonymous as one organization. Jurisdictions differ in how they apply unauthorized-access, conspiracy, and criminal-association law to decentralized networks. Legal findings should be reported with the exact offense, court, procedural posture, and outcome.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-08-anonymous-legal-cases.md",
            "title": "Anonymous in Courts and Law-Enforcement Records",
            "bytes": 51415,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Anonymous Legal Cases Research.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "movement-history-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-04-anonymous-geopolitical-conflicts",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "movement analysis",
                "conflict reporting",
                "attribution",
                "publication safety"
            ],
            "sha256": "c457bc2494795ea0d87d8574bb032ca9b64330c541365914f4c1ea72fd7371c1",
            "summary": "Anonymous-branded activity in crises is best treated as a set of claims by a reusable, decentralized brand. Verified effects are often narrower than public claims, and attribution is complicated by recycled material, splinters, state-aligned actors, and false-flag use. Symbolic and information effects should be separated from durable strategic disruption.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-04-anonymous-geopolitical-conflicts.md",
            "title": "Anonymous in Geopolitical Conflicts and Crisis Information",
            "bytes": 58248,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Anonymous Geopolitical Conflict Analysis.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "legal-oversight-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-09-osint-whistleblower-verification",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "source protection",
                "editorial workflow",
                "privacy",
                "claim ledger"
            ],
            "sha256": "1755491ada125822f9542826a9812c402bfc33399561a999fcb6573d882cd0f7",
            "summary": "Source protection and verification solve different problems. Confidentiality may be essential for public-interest disclosure, but it does not authenticate documents or prove a claim. Publishers should preserve chain of custody, assess motive and access, seek independent corroboration, give subjects a response opportunity, and keep corrections visible.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-09-osint-whistleblower-verification.md",
            "title": "Anonymous Sources, Whistleblower Protections, and OSINT Verification",
            "bytes": 53635,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/OSINT And Whistleblower Verification Framework.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "movement-history-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-05-anonymous-symbols-disputes",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "symbol interpretation",
                "media literacy",
                "movement identity",
                "source conflict"
            ],
            "sha256": "0dbe9893290071a74fdae6869aa0eddb36bc5bb255e327012cdbfdf918800538",
            "summary": "The Guy Fawkes mask, headless-suit logo, and recurring slogans provide a shared aesthetic, not proof of shared membership or centralized authority. Media frames range from civil-resistance narratives to criminal-threat narratives, while internal schisms, splinters, appropriation, and infiltration make brand-level claims especially fragile.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-05-anonymous-symbols-disputes.md",
            "title": "Anonymous Symbols, Media Representation, and Internal Disagreement",
            "bytes": 56801,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Anonymous Symbols And Disputes.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "movement-history-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-07-anonymous-origins-history",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "historical context",
                "movement identity",
                "media feedback",
                "timeline design"
            ],
            "sha256": "2f37a56131fcb3fb59eff28ba4b06eb087fdef406a578f3293ec9770c914e995",
            "summary": "Anonymous began as a default imageboard identity and subcultural mass noun before parts of the culture shifted toward political hacktivism. Project Chanology, physical protests, and later campaigns transformed the public meaning of the label, but that evolution did not create a formal membership roster or permanent command hierarchy.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-07-anonymous-origins-history.md",
            "title": "Anonymous: Origins, Naming, and Early Development (2003–2010)",
            "bytes": 54458,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Anonymous Origins And Early History.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "movement-structure-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-11-anonymous-structure-membership",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "entity taxonomy",
                "membership claims",
                "temporary authority",
                "attribution"
            ],
            "sha256": "1ac8d501fcae9812750099a8f34a3346bdb138cd706ecde393f8ae0ccbdab393",
            "summary": "Anonymous is more accurately represented as overlapping layers—a label, collective identity, audience, participant pool, temporary campaign network, and sometimes a closed technical cell. Membership claims vary by sociological, participant, journalistic, legal, and forensic definitions. Infrastructure control can create temporary power without permanent leadership.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-11-anonymous-structure-membership.md",
            "title": "Anonymous: Structure, Membership Claims, and Decision-Making",
            "bytes": 65781,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Anonymous Structure And Membership Research.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "legal-oversight-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-02-comparative-intelligence-oversight-remedy",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "product governance",
                "appeals",
                "audit trails",
                "rights and remedy",
                "international fairness"
            ],
            "sha256": "72d35b8850fed2fbadd4bdb45d6a4f8da558dfa848caba6470808c92fe32b8fa",
            "summary": "Compare oversight systems by what bodies can actually access, compel, authorize, investigate, publish, adjudicate, and remedy—not by labels alone. Courts, commissioners, inspectors, parliamentary bodies, and privacy regulators perform different functions, and public transparency is structurally incomplete in every reviewed system.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-02-comparative-intelligence-oversight-remedy.md",
            "title": "Comparative Intelligence Oversight, Transparency, and Remedy",
            "bytes": 62329,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Comparative Intelligence Oversight, Transparency, and Remedy.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "methodology-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-01-information-operations-neutral-evidence",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "research pack",
                "writing pack",
                "marketing pack",
                "evidence UI",
                "correction/versioning"
            ],
            "sha256": "06bc8b60f0696161f298dfe2b9e15f9fe41ea315912b026f69534351dc7fd679",
            "summary": "Treat influence attribution as a ladder rather than a binary label. Content falsity, coordination, actor identity, sponsorship, intent, reach, and effect are separate propositions with different proof burdens. Behavior-based platform findings do not automatically prove every item false, and repeated reporting does not create independent corroboration.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-01-information-operations-neutral-evidence.md",
            "title": "Information Operations, Disinformation, and Neutral Evidence Presentation",
            "bytes": 62308,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Information Operations, Disinformation, and Neutral Evidence Presentation.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "methodology-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-03-osint-verification-attribution",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "research pack",
                "teacher/student pack",
                "source review",
                "provenance",
                "public API metadata"
            ],
            "sha256": "5c87b40f4f9b0244f07ab6988002c5fe9921b19a5fb4de9b1b47fc6fe77b840e",
            "summary": "Verification is strongest when evidence is recorded by origin, directness, independence, authenticity, timeliness, corroboration, and custody. Claim status, analytic confidence, and source reliability are not interchangeable. Provenance tools can help establish origin and edit history, but they are not general truth machines.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-03-osint-verification-attribution.md",
            "title": "OSINT Verification and Attribution Under Uncertainty",
            "bytes": 61286,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/OSINT Verification and Attribution Under Uncertainty.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        },
        {
            "classification": "privacy-rights-public-summary",
            "duplicateOfId": null,
            "group": "evidence-and-movements",
            "id": "evi-12-metadata-identity-inference",
            "integrationAreas": [
                "privacy",
                "identity boundaries",
                "automated decisions",
                "appeals",
                "data minimization"
            ],
            "sha256": "dba25bc69f8ce1764953a784ee4f05178e39d431c9677a47388755981f9136e0",
            "summary": "Metadata and derived attributes can identify, classify, or disadvantage people without containing an explicit name. De-identification is fragile when records can be cross-linked, and automated inference can encode proxy bias or produce false matches. Observed data, derived inference, and proven identity must remain separate.",
            "summaryPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/summaries/evi-12-metadata-identity-inference.md",
            "title": "Surveillance, Metadata, Data Brokers, and Identity Inference",
            "bytes": 69689,
            "fullSourceRetainedInDownload": true,
            "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true,
            "originalPath": "/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/originals/Metadata And Identity Inference Analysis.md",
            "evidenceStatus": "preserved-source-not-independently-reverified",
            "currentFactRecheckRequired": true
        }
    ],
    "links": {
        "publicLibrary": "https://spiralistai.com/research/",
        "safeCatalog": "https://spiralistai.com/research/catalog.json",
        "publicSourceRegister": "https://spiralistai.com/docs/research-v100.0.42/source-register.json",
        "aiPsyopsTaxonomy": "https://spiralistai.com/research/ai-psyops/",
        "aiPsyopsApi": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/research/ai-psyops/",
        "integrationMap": "https://spiralistai.com/docs/research/v100.0.34/psychological-warfare-semiotics-governance/integration-map.md",
        "psychologicalWarfareCollection": "https://spiralistai.com/docs/research/v100.0.34/psychological-warfare-semiotics-governance/index.md",
        "longTermMemoryCompleteness": "https://spiralistai.com/docs/long-term-memory/all-uploaded-document-memory-v100.0.34.json",
        "evidenceAndMovementsCollection": "https://spiralistai.com/docs/research/v100.0.22/evidence-movements-oversight/index.md",
        "headingDeepLinks": "https://spiralistai.com/docs/research/v100.0.34/psychological-warfare-semiotics-governance/heading-deep-links.json",
        "apiGuide": "https://spiralistai.com/api-guide/#research",
        "publicUaiResearchIndex": "https://spiralistai.com/uai/research-index.uai",
        "retainedHistoricalResearchIndex": "https://spiralistai.com/docs/research-v96/index.md"
    },
    "safety": {
        "operationallySensitiveReportsAreNotServedAsInstructions": true,
        "fullReportsRemainInDownloadForInternalProvenance": true,
        "runtimeUsesSanitizedFictionalAbstractions": true,
        "evidenceAndMovementsCollectionIsNonOperational": true,
        "psychologicalWarfareCollectionIsHistoricalEducationalAndNonOperational": true,
        "aiPsyopsCollectionIsDefensiveEducationalAndNonOperational": true,
        "timeSensitiveClaimsRequireRecheck": true
    }
}